Comments on: What Really Happened on September 11?

By: Michael Korn

Michael Korn — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:24:20 +0000

Perhaps this will shed some more light for you: two years ago I was distributing a flyer about this very topic in Boulder Colorado. A group of Fox newspeople took me aside and told me, after seeing me over a period of a few days, that all of them accept that the official 9-11 report was a totally bogus whitewash, but that the network executives in New York prevent them from investigating the story fairly and thoroughly.

By: A. Rogers

A. Rogers — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:23:18 +0000

“If we were not really attacked by Muslims on 9/11, these two wars were equally unjustified (as well as equally illegal under international law).”

In any case, we were not attacked by Iraqis or Afghans. The government of Afghanistan simply wanted the U.S. government to provide enough evidence for extraditing conspirators purportedly staying in Afghanistan, which the U.S. government never did.

By: Bob Cable

Bob Cable — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:32:31 +0000

IMHO, you make an overwhelming case for the falsity of “the official conspiracy theory” of the U.S. federal government and the 9/11 Commission. But your interviewer here, Dr. Sam Vaknin (among many others) faults you for failing “to present a compelling case in support of the alternative conspiracy theory…that the Bush administration was behind the attack, one way or the other.”

Your conviction that “something is rotten in the state…” seems to have grown with the passage of time and mounting evidence amassed by your own and others’ research. Will you eventually attempt to elaborate the probable actual conspiracy? Vincent Bugliosi did a great job with “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for War Crime,” although he has (unfortunately!) not also joined the 9/11 Truth Movement.